Archive for July, 2008

J. I. Packer on Worship Styles

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008

Between Two Worlds is running a great quote by J. I. Packer that I think bears consideration. James Innell Packer serves as the Board of Governors’ Professor of Theology at Regent College in Vancouver, British Columbia. He’s an executive editor of Christianity Today and served as general editor for the English Standard Version of the Bible. In a resent issue of Modern Reformation magazine Packer comments on the “niche” marketing approach that is creating a generational divide in many churches today:

“We have separated the ages, very much to the loss of each age. In the New Testament, the Christian church is an all-age community, and in real life the experience of the family to look no further should convince us that the interaction of the ages is enriching. The principle is that generations should be mixed up in the church for the glory of God. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t disciple groups of people of the same age or the same sex separately from time to time. That’s a good thing to do. But for the most part, the right thing is the mixed community in which everybody is making the effort to understand and empathize with all the other people in the other age groups. Make the effort is the key phrase here. Older people tend not to make the effort to understand younger people, and younger people are actually encouraged not to make the effort to understand older people. That’s a loss of a crucial Christian value in my judgment.”

This is an interesting concept when you think about it. We’ve gotten so accustomed to viewing church ministry from an age appropriate model or from the perspective of targeted demographics that the idea of “mixed community” is virtually foreign. Now Packer doesn’t completely reject specialized discipleship ministry, but the important issue here seems to be unity – bringing the body of Christ together as one. Packer goes on to describe one area that contributes greatly to this atmosphere of separation:

“If worship styles are so fixed that what’s being offered fits the expectations, the hopes, even the prejudices, of any one of these groups as opposed to the others, I don’t believe the worship style glorifies God, and some change, some reformation, some adjustment, and some enlargement of spiritual vision is really called for.”

Put simply, blended worship promotes community in the church. It brings the body of Christ together in “one accord” and “one mind” by looking out not only for our own interests, “but also for the interests of others.” In that way blended worship becomes so much more than just a transition to contemporary worship; it becomes more than just the means by which we bring our older church members out of traditionalism into a more contemporary style. It becomes a very Philippians chapter 2 approach to the way we do church ministry…by serving one another selflessly.

Informed Consent in South Dakota

Monday, July 28th, 2008

A funny thing happened last Monday at the Sioux Falls, South Dakota Planned Parenthood abortion clinic…absolutely nothing! That’s right. As women began showing up at 8:00 in the morning for their abortion appointments, they were met with a sign hanging on the door that read “CLOSED”! How on earth is this possible, you may ask? Here’s how. Monday marked the first day in which Planned Parenthood was required to comply with the new South Dakota Abortion Informed Consent Law.

Here’s what the new law requires:

* Abortion doctors must advise pregnant mothers, IN WRITING, that the abortion will “terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being.”

* There must be full disclosure of the medical risks of abortion, including the risk of depression and the increased risk of suicide and suicidal tendencies.

* Penalties for noncompliance could include imprisonment, loss of medical license, and even civil prosecution.

In short, Planned Parenthood in South Dakota is being required to TELL THE TRUTH. What’s amazing about all this is it appears that at least for now Planned Parenthood abortion doctors would rather do business elsewhere than be honest with pregnant mothers about what it is that they’re doing, thus confirming that they’re exactly the kind of slime we all knew them to be.

Now look, I’m not naïve enough to believe that abortions have come to a screeching halt in South Dakota. At some point there will be abortionists who are willing to take the risk of performing abortions again. In addition if women want to get abortions bad enough without all the hassle, surly they’ll be willing to travel as far away as Bismarck or Minneapolis or Sioux City. But for one day at least, no unborn babies were killed in South Dakota. There is a God in heaven!

Happy Anniversary Mrs. Black

Monday, July 21st, 2008

iMonk’s Worship Riff

Monday, July 14th, 2008

Michael Spencer has some great remarks on a recent article in “The Briefing” entitled “The Slow Death of Congregational Singing” asserting that “genuine, heartfelt congregational singing is experiencing its dying gasps.” Spencer writes:

“As a whole, we’re on our way to pretty much what you have on The Letterman Show. The band plays and Dave comes out with the monologue.”

“Congregational singing is commanded in the New Testament’s description of gathered worship. If we replace that with performance, it’s a major loss on several levels, not the least being the level of teaching and encouragement specifically mentioned in the epistles.”

It’s not that contemporary worship is bad per se, but as Spencer sees it, here’s the draw back:

“It’s designed for expressive presentation and not as much for edification through musical teaching or mutual encouragement. So you can have a lot of ‘You are holy!’ and ‘I will worship,’ as opposed to four or five verses describing the incarnation or considerations of the meaning of salvation.”

I couldn’t agree more. We utilize a lot of contemporary praise and worship at our church. I think there are a number of well written, singable worship tunes that do a good job of expressing who God is and what He has done. But let’s face it. The shelf life of even the most popular praise song is a drop in the bucket in comparison to the old hymns of the faith. It’s been said, “We don’t sing the great old songs because they’re old. We sing them because they’re great.” That’s why in addition to PowerPoint I insist on having hymnals at our church. How else are we going to pass down the rich heritage of biblical truth in corporate worship?

Great is thy faithfulness, O God my Father;
There is no shadow of turning with Thee.
Thou changest not; Thy compassions, they fail not.
As thou has been Thou for ever wilt be.

Great is Thy faithfulness! Great is Thy faithfulness!
Morning by morning new mercies I see;
All I have needed Thy hand hath provided.
Great is Thy faithfulness, Lord, unto me!

Who writes lyrics like that anymore?