An Inconvenient Reality
Thursday, October 18th, 2007
There was a time when winning the Nobel Prize was considered one of the most celebrated achievements in the world. Unfortunately in recent years its regard has diminished greatly as it has become more and more a symbol of extreme humanism. Case in point: Al Gore winning the Nobel Peace Prize for his 2006 documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”. Would someone please tell me how an alarmist film on global warming filled with errors based upon faulty science has facilitated world “peace”? The Nobel committee applauded Gore for his efforts to “build up and disseminate greater knowledge about manmade climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change.” Apparently Gore had convinced them that man is in control of his environment and therefore must act before he loses control.
That’s very interesting. This is just the kind of thinking one would expect from an organization that views the world from a Godless perspective. You see the Bible is very clear about our position in the universe. While it is true that man has been given the responsibility for stewardship over God’s creation, the reality is that God, not man, is in control. Unfortunately when a society rejects that inconvenient reality the end result is worship of the environment. This is exactly what Paul describes in Romans chapter one.
“Their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity…..they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and WORSHIPED AND SERVED CREATED THINGS rather than the Creator….” (Romans 1:21-25)
There’s an interesting new book that appeared on the New York Times Best Sellers list recently that I think illustrates this point further. It’s called “The World Without Us – What Earth would be like if humans disappeared” by Alan Weisman. Weisman’s website describes it as showing “how our planet would respond without the relentless pressure of the human presence….what the planet might be like today, if not for us.” The whole idea is to demonstrate “Earth’s tremendous capacity for self-healing”, seemingly as if to say that man is nothing more than a disease or an infection, a blight on the planet. Sounds a bit like a scene from “The Matrix”. It’s like we’re saying that man is somehow at odds with nature, that our very existence is somehow…unnatural. Man must, therefore, be some sort of freak of nature, an accident if you will, certainly not put here by design.
The other thing that I find astounding is the obvious absence of the sustaining hand of God. Apparently the book is meant as some sort of wakeup call to mankind about our wanton destruction of the planet, ignoring the plain truth that we didn’t create it, therefore, we don’t have it within us to destroy it. The Creator of the universe is fully capable of maintaining and caring for the earth until He himself sees fit to put an end to its existence. We live in a Godless society that worships the environment in exactly the way that scriptures said they would.



